http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lm3bUEePRMU&feature=player_embedded
Thursday, February 2, 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lm3bUEePRMU&feature=player_embedded
Spiralling into a trajectory?
"'We have a very unbalanced ecology and it's all just spiralling into a trajectory', lamented Prof Bowman."
I would love someone to provide a diagram or equation that would represent this 'spiralling into a trajectory'.
Read more at the BBC: http://bbc.in/wLStPv
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
Finding the truth and beauty in data
Friday, June 24, 2011
Language and Olympic ticket maths
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
Olympics tickets ballot
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
If the secretary of state says it's true, it's probably wrong
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Friday, January 8, 2010
Bad maths in the supermarket
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Fieldfares count Fibonacci
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
To The Times, radius = diameter
The Times begins well by explaining the principles previously touched
on here but then goes on to expose it's correspondent's belief that
the radius is the same as the diameter. That is to say, since the
diameter of a Reuleaux polygon is constant then so must be the radius
but of course this not the case. The axle of a Reuleaux polygonal
wheel will rise and fall with it's forward progress.
Furthermore, if, as in this case, the front wheel is a Reuleaux
pentagon and the rear a Reuleuax triangle, the bobbing up and down
effect will be inconstant. Very uncomfortable if not nauseating.
http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article6366308.ece
Friday, May 22, 2009
It's a Rouleaux Triangle/Pentagon etc
last post is that we are talking about Reuleaux polygons. These are a
curve of constant width - that is, a curve such that, if two parallel
lines are drawn tangent to the curve, the distance between them does
not depend on their orientation.
Well, that's what Wikipedia says anyway:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuleaux_triangle
And this is confirmed by Wolfram Mathworld with a bit more technical
stuff: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ReuleauxTriangle.html
I had forgotten about the rotary combustion engine which makes use of
the properties of such polygons:
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/rotary-engine2.htm
Thank you to Lyndon Baker for the original pointer to these resources.
Sunday, May 10, 2009
What's do you call the shape of a UK 50p piece?
The reason I ask? I caught this news item at Ananova about Guan Baihua, 50, a retired military officer in Qingdao, who spent 18 months developing his unique bike.
Monday, May 4, 2009
Australian politician grows 2.7 metres taller
Ananova, an online news provider, . She is now over 4 metres tall
which should provide her with a dominating political presence in the
Logan city council chamber.
Fed up with what she saw as her diminutive height of 1.52m she paid a
Russian clinic to break her legs in four places and had them stretched
by "1mm a day for nine months". As a result, then, she is now 4.2
metres tall.
"Ms Ban was taunted at school and feared her height would damage her
credibility as she entered the legal profession and later went into
local politics." I reckon it's not her credibility that is damaged but
the basic mathematics of the journalist(s) involved.
You can read the full story here:
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_3303713.html
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
I am so seriously under-weight...
...I am so seriously under-weight that I am amazed I am still alive.
In a report about this new diet medication the journalist tells us
that the pill is only available to those with a body mass index of 28
or more.
To check whether I qualified, I used their formula as published and my
Body Mass Index works out at 0.037.
Using the same algorithm I calculate that in order to qualify for the
pill I would either have to weigh 110g or be 49m tall.
Try the formula yourself:
BMI is a system used to determine how healthy your weight is in
relation to your height. Here's how to work out yours:
1 Measure your height in metres and multiply the figure by itself.
2 Measure your weight in kilos
3 Divide the weight by the answer to no.1
If you qualify for the diet pill with BMI of 28 or over using this
algorithm, then do let me know!
Thursday, February 5, 2009
One dollar = one cent according to American phone company
But the concept of comparing negative numbers proved too difficult for some Camelot received dozens of complaints on the first day from players who could not understand how, for example, -5 is higher than -6.
Saturday, December 13, 2008
Prime numbers and multiples of six...
We, my nine year old twins and I, had spent the day chasing Christmas trees, writing cards, sorting out the lights and all those other festive bits and pieces. Lacking energy, I caved (well it didn't take much to be honest) and agreed to chips for tea. Added the compulsory greenery and we sat down to tea with the usual demand for a quiz (sometimes its our version of Twenty Questions...). Anyway Megan's chosen subject: Maths.
Mum invents the questions and to get to the point, a discussion ensued on how to identify whether or not a number is prime. Caitlin asks: "Is three billion and 1 a prime number?" I can't answer in the time available (Strictly Come Dancing is going to start soon). Then Caitlin announces that, apparently, all prime numbers are either one less than, or one more than a multiple of six. Therefore, it seems, that you can at least say that a number is not prime if that requirement is not met.
They all rushed off to watch the semi final - the maths of the SCD quarter and semi finals is another story - leaving me to discover that this multiple of six thing is true and to wonder why I had never heard that before. Maybe it's just me that it has passed by or that has passed it by...
Nine year olds...hah!
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Why do car wheels have an odd number of spokes...
Five spokes and seven seemed the most frequent but there was one with three spokes. There were none I could see with four, six or eight. Googling revealed this article which sort of discusses the axes of symmetry of a Ferrari wheel (five spokes) but only refers to the aesthetics rather than there being any engineering rationale behind the oddness.
A Google images search seems to indicate that odd is by far the overwhelming favourite for spokes but not exclusively so. It would seem that eight is not uncommon among what seem to be high-performance cars (those that are involved in high speed racing for example). Thus maybe it is just aesthetic. It would be interesting to hear what others think.